TSTP Solution File: PUZ140^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:49:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 7 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 21 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 82 ( 17 ~; 6 |; 4 &; 54 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 33 ( 33 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 4 ^ 22 !; 10 ?; 37 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
beverage: $tType ).
thf(type_def_7,type,
syrup: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
syrup: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
beverage: $tType ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
coffee: beverage ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
heat: beverage > beverage ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
hot: beverage > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
mix: beverage > syrup > beverage ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
hot_mixture: beverage > syrup > beverage ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
cold_mixture: beverage > syrup > beverage ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
sK0: ( beverage > syrup > beverage ) > syrup ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
ph2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f23,plain,
$false,
inference(flex-flex_simplify,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage,X1: beverage] :
( ( X0 @ coffee
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: beverage,Y1: syrup] : ( heat @ ( X0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
!= X1 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage,X1: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: beverage,Y1: syrup] : ( heat @ ( X0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
!= X1 )
| ( $true != $true ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f20,f18]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X0: beverage] :
( ( hot @ ( heat @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
! [X0: beverage] :
( ( hot @ ( heat @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
! [X0: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ X0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
! [X0: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.k7UH2TrYbe/Vampire---4.8_21210',its_hot) ).
thf(f20,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
( ( hot @ ( X0 @ coffee @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
! [X2: beverage,X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 )
| ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage,X2: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 )
| ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f13,f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
( ? [X1: syrup] :
! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ X1 )
!= X2 )
| ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true ) )
=> ! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
!= X2 )
| ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
? [X1: syrup] :
! [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ X1 )
!= X2 )
| ( ( hot @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
~ ? [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( ( X0 @ coffee @ X1 )
= X2 )
& ( ( hot @ X2 )
= $true ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
~ ? [X0: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X2: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X2 )
& ( ( X0 @ coffee @ X1 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X0: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X0 )
& ( ( X2 @ coffee @ X1 )
= X0 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,conjecture,
? [X2: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
! [X1: syrup] :
? [X0: beverage] :
( ( hot @ X0 )
& ( ( X2 @ coffee @ X1 )
= X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.k7UH2TrYbe/Vampire---4.8_21210',hot_coffee) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:04:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.k7UH2TrYbe/Vampire---4.8_21210
% 0.14/0.38 % (21405)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21406)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21411)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21412)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21408)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21410)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21407)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21405)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21409)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (21411)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (21405)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (21404)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------